Arc Graphics 140T
Radeon Pro 465
Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon Pro 465 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon Pro 465 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon Pro 465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 140T
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.9 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon Pro 465 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140T is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2025 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon Pro 465
2016Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌42.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 12.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140T vs Radeon Pro 465 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the Radeon Pro 465 reaches 4,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Boost clocks: 2350 MHz vs 907 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,538 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | GCN 4.0 |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1024+12700% |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz+159% | 907 MHz |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 465 carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro 465 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140T and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 465. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6 | 129.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 140T came in at $350, while the Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 140T was 30% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.9 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) — the Arc Graphics 140T offers 41.8% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140T (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-30% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9+42% | 9.1 |
| Codename | — | Baffin |
| Release | January 6 2025 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #409 | #547 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140T and Radeon Pro 465
