Arc Graphics 140T
VS
GeForce GTX 580

Arc Graphics 140T vs GeForce GTX 580

Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

2025Boost: 2350 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 580

2010Core: 772 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140T is positioned at rank #330 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T

#320
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
844%
#322
765%
#323
763%
#327
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
694%
#328
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
689%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
100%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
99%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
99%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
97%
#335
GeForce 710A
MSRP: $35|Avg: $62
96%
#336
95%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
94%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
94%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
93%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 140T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2010). The Arc Graphics 140T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (3 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140T.

InsightArc Graphics 140TGeForce GTX 580
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity
Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 90% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 929.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightArc Graphics 140TGeForce GTX 580
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+929.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140T and GeForce GTX 580

Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 580

The GeForce GTX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 9 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 772 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 244W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,634 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the GeForce GTX 580 reaches 4,634 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the GeForce GTX 580 uses Fermi 2.0. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 580).

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce GTX 580
G3D Mark Score
4,500
4,634+3%
Architecture
Xe+
Fermi 2.0
Shading Units
8
512+6300%
L2 Cache
8 MB+967%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce GTX 580
Upscaling Tech
XeSS
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 580 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 580 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 580) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce GTX 580
VRAM Capacity
Shared
3 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
192 GB/s
Bus Width
System
384-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+967%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce GTX 580
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs None (GeForce GTX 580). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 580).

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce GTX 580
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
None
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 580's 244W — a 149.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 580). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85 C.

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce GTX 580
TDP
35W-86%
244W
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
Integrated
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
85 C
Perf/Watt
128.6+577%
19.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce GTX 580 launched at $499 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 580 costs 90% less ($270 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 154.5 (GeForce GTX 580) — the GeForce GTX 580 offers 930% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2010).

FeatureArc Graphics 140TGeForce GTX 580
MSRP
$350-30%
$499
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$30-90%
Performance per Dollar
15.0
154.5+930%
Codename
GF110
Release
January 6 2025
November 9 2010
Ranking
#409
#458