CPU
GPU
Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
FirePro S7000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140T is positioned at rank 330 and the FirePro S7000 is on rank 241, so the FirePro S7000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2012). The Arc Graphics 140T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S7000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S7000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140T.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (292mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro S7000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 654% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140T | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+654%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140T and FirePro S7000
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
FirePro S7000
The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140T scores 4,500 and the FirePro S7000 reaches 4,524 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140T is built on Xe+ while the FirePro S7000 uses GCN 1.0. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 1,280 (FirePro S7000).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,524 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | GCN 1.0 |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1280+15900% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+1500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro S7000 has 4 GB. The FirePro S7000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro S7000) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+1500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 12 (11_1) (FirePro S7000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S7000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs H.264 (FirePro S7000).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140T draws 35W versus the FirePro S7000's 150W — a 124.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 350W (FirePro S7000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 292mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-77% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 292mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 128.6+326% | 30.2 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the FirePro S7000 launched at $1249 and now averages $40. The FirePro S7000 costs 86.7% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) vs 113.1 (FirePro S7000) — the FirePro S7000 offers 654% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2012).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140T | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-72% | $1249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $40-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 113.1+654% |
| Codename | — | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 6 2025 | August 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #409 | #462 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140T and FirePro S7000
