Arc Graphics 130V vs Arc Graphics 140T
Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 130V is positioned at rank 302 and the Arc Graphics 140T is on rank 330, so the Arc Graphics 130V offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140T.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc Graphics 130V offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 20.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130V and Arc Graphics 140T
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the Arc Graphics 140T reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the Arc Graphics 140T uses Xe+. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140T). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 2350 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,510 | 4,500 |
| Architecture | Xe² | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 7 | 8+14% |
| Boost Clock | 1850 MHz | 2350 MHz+27% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 35W — a 80% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140T). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-57% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 300.7+134% | 128.6 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 and now averages $300. The Arc Graphics 130V costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Arc Graphics 130V offers 20% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-14% | $350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0+20% | 15.0 |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | — |
| Release | September 24 2024 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #463 | #409 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130V and Arc Graphics 140T
