Arc Graphics 130V vs Arc Graphics 140T

Intel

Arc Graphics 130V

2024Boost: 1850 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

2025Boost: 2350 MHz
Similar parts
······

Arc Graphics 130V vs Arc Graphics 140T Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 130V vs Arc Graphics 140T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 130V

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • Delivers 16.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 12.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • Arc Graphics 140T is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Arc Graphics 130V is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Arc Graphics 140T

2025

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2025 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 16.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $350 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc Graphics 130V is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (4,510 vs 4,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 130V is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 3nm process instead of Unknown node. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 130V makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $350, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 16.9% (15.0 vs 12.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc Graphics 130V vs Arc Graphics 140T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 130V

The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the Arc Graphics 140T reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the Arc Graphics 140T uses Xe+. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140T). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 2350 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VArc Graphics 140T
G3D Mark Score
4,510
4,500
Architecture
Xe²
Xe+
Shading Units
7
8+14%
Boost Clock
1850 MHz
2350 MHz+27%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 130VArc Graphics 140T
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130V and System on the Arc Graphics 140T.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VArc Graphics 140T
VRAM Capacity
Shared
Shared
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VArc Graphics 140T
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T).

FeatureArc Graphics 130VArc Graphics 140T
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
Xe Media Engine
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
Xe Media Engine
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 35W — a 80% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140T). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VArc Graphics 140T
TDP
15W-57%
35W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
300.7+134%
128.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 130V came in at $300, while the Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 130V was 14.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 12.9 (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Arc Graphics 130V offers 16.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140T (2025 vs 2024).

FeatureArc Graphics 130VArc Graphics 140T
MSRP
$300-14%
$350
Performance per Dollar
15.0+16%
12.9
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
Release
September 24 2024
January 6 2025
Ranking
#463
#409

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.