Arc Graphics 130V vs Quadro P1000

Intel

Arc Graphics 130V

2024Boost: 1850 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P1000

2017Core: 1493 MHzBoost: 1519 MHz

Arc Graphics 130V vs Quadro P1000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 130V vs Quadro P1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 130V

2024

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Quadro P1000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 130V is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 40W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quadro P1000

2017

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 166.7% higher power demand at 40W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc Graphics 130V is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (4,510 vs 4,495), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 130V is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 3nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 130V makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc Graphics 130V vs Quadro P1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 130V

The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P1000

The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on 3 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 1519 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VQuadro P1000
G3D Mark Score
4,510
4,495
Architecture
Xe²
Pascal
Process Node
3 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
7
640+9043%
Boost Clock
1850 MHz+22%
1519 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 130VQuadro P1000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P1000 carries 4 GB. Quadro P1000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130V and 64-bit on the Quadro P1000.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VQuadro P1000
VRAM Capacity
Shared
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VQuadro P1000
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000).

FeatureArc Graphics 130VQuadro P1000
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 90.9% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VQuadro P1000
TDP
15W-63%
40W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
145mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
300.7+168%
112.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 130V came in at $300, while the Quadro P1000 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro P1000 was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs Infinity (Quadro P1000) — the Quadro P1000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130V (2024 vs 2017).

FeatureArc Graphics 130VQuadro P1000
MSRP
$300
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
15.0
Infinity
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
GP107
Release
September 24 2024
February 7 2017
Ranking
#463
#466

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.