Arc Graphics 130V
GRID T4-8Q
Arc Graphics 130V vs GRID T4-8Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 130V vs GRID T4-8Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc Graphics 130V vs GRID T4-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 130V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 689.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅GRID T4-8Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 130V is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GRID T4-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌733.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 130V vs GRID T4-8Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
GRID T4-8Q
The GRID T4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,762 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 versus the GRID T4-8Q's 4,762 — the GRID T4-8Q leads by 5.6%. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the GRID T4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 1,536 (GRID T4-8Q).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,510 | 4,762+6% |
| Architecture | Xe² | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 1536+21843% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID T4-8Q carries 2 GB. GRID T4-8Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130V and 64-bit on the GRID T4-8Q.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the GRID T4-8Q's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 350W (GRID T4-8Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-85% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 300.7+532% | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 130V came in at $300, while the GRID T4-8Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 130V was 88% cheaper ($2200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 1.9 (GRID T4-8Q) — the Arc Graphics 130V offers 689.5% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130V (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-88% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0+689% | 1.9 |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | GM204 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #463 | #535 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130V and GRID T4-8Q
