Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce GTX 580
Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 130V is positioned at rank #302 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2010). The Arc Graphics 130V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (3 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130V, it costs 88% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 756.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+756.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130V and GeForce GTX 580
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
GeForce GTX 580
The GeForce GTX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 9 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 772 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 244W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,634 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the GeForce GTX 580 reaches 4,634 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the GeForce GTX 580 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 3 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 580).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,510 | 4,634+3% |
| Architecture | Xe² | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 512+7214% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 580 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 580 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 384-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V) vs None (GeForce GTX 580). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 580).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | None |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 580's 244W — a 176.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 580). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85 C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-94% | 244W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 C |
| Perf/Watt | 300.7+1483% | 19.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the GeForce GTX 580 launched at $499 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 580 costs 88% less ($220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 154.5 (GeForce GTX 580) — the GeForce GTX 580 offers 758.3% better value. The Arc Graphics 130V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2010).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-40% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $30-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 154.5+758% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | GF110 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | November 9 2010 |
| Ranking | #463 | #458 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130V and GeForce GTX 580
