Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon R9 370
Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 130V is positioned at rank #302 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2015). The Arc Graphics 130V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 370 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $55 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130V, it costs 78% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 375.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+375.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($55) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130V and Radeon R9 370
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
Radeon R9 370
The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,510 | 4,722+5% |
| Architecture | Xe² | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 1280+18186% |
| Boost Clock | 1850 MHz+90% | 975 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 370 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 179 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 152% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-86% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 221mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 300.7+601% | 42.9 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149 and now averages $55. The Radeon R9 370 costs 78% less ($195 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 85.9 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 377.2% better value. The Arc Graphics 130V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $149-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $55-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 85.9+377% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Trinidad |
| Release | September 24 2024 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #463 | #456 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130V and Radeon R9 370
