Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intel

Arc Graphics 130V

2024Boost: 1850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Nano

2015Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon R9 Nano Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon R9 Nano: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 130V

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $349 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Delivers 111.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Radeon R9 Nano is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 130V is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 175W, a 160W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 116.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $649 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 1066.7% higher power demand at 175W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 Nano is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (4,609 vs 4,510), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 130V is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 3nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 130V makes the most sense to buy today. It is $349 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 111.7% (15.0 vs 7.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 Nano still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon R9 Nano Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 130V

The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the Radeon R9 Nano reaches 4,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VRadeon R9 Nano
G3D Mark Score
4,510
4,609+2%
Architecture
Xe²
GCN 3.0
Process Node
3 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
7
4096+58414%
Boost Clock
1850 MHz+85%
1000 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 130VRadeon R9 Nano
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Nano carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 Nano gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130V and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Nano.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VRadeon R9 Nano
VRAM Capacity
Shared
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
HBM
Memory Bandwidth
System
512 GB/s
Bus Width
System
4096-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 12 (Radeon R9 Nano). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VRadeon R9 Nano
DirectX
12.2+2%
12
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Nano). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 6.0.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VRadeon R9 Nano
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCE 3.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 168.4% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 152mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VRadeon R9 Nano
TDP
15W-91%
175W
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 8-pin
Length
0mm
152mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
300.7+1043%
26.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 130V came in at $300, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 130V was 53.8% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Arc Graphics 130V offers 111.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130V (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureArc Graphics 130VRadeon R9 Nano
MSRP
$300-54%
$649
Performance per Dollar
15.0+111%
7.1
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
Fiji
Release
September 24 2024
August 27 2015
Ranking
#463
#306

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.