
Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 130V is positioned at rank #302 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The Arc Graphics 130V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc Graphics 130V remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130V and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 3 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 1011 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,510 | 4,498 |
| Architecture | Xe² | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 1280+18186% |
| Boost Clock | 1850 MHz+83% | 1011 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 125% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-77% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 300.7+335% | 69.2 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL costs 100+% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The Arc Graphics 130V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Polaris 22 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | April 24 2018 |
| Ranking | #463 | #464 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















