Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon Sky 500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon Sky 500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon Sky 500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 130V

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Radeon Sky 500 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 130V is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Sky 500

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
66.7% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Sky 500 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.7% in PassMark G3D (4,723 vs 4,510), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc Graphics 130V is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 3nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc Graphics 130V makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 59.2% (15.0 vs 9.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Sky 500 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon Sky 500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc Graphics 130V

The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.

Radeon Sky 500

The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the Radeon Sky 500 reaches 4,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500).

Feature	Arc Graphics 130V	Radeon Sky 500
G3D Mark Score	4,510	4,723+5%
Architecture	Xe²	GCN 1.0
Process Node	3 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	7	1280+18186%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc Graphics 130V	Radeon Sky 500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Sky 500 carries 2 GB. Radeon Sky 500 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130V and 64-bit on the Radeon Sky 500.

Feature	Arc Graphics 130V	Radeon Sky 500
VRAM Capacity	Shared	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Arc Graphics 130V	Radeon Sky 500
TDP	15W-90%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	300.7+855%	31.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 130V came in at $300, while the Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 130V was 40% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) — the Arc Graphics 130V offers 59.6% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130V (2024 vs 2013).

Feature	Arc Graphics 130V	Radeon Sky 500
MSRP	$300-40%	$500
Performance per Dollar	15.0+60%	9.4
Codename	Lunar Lake iGPU	Pitcairn
Release	September 24 2024	March 27 2013
Ranking	#463	#455

Search Arc Graphics 130V on Amazon

Search Radeon Sky 500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.