
Arc Graphics 130V vs Arc A350M

Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:

Arc A350M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 130V is positioned at rank 302 and the Arc A350M is on rank 86, so the Arc A350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Per Dollar Arc A350M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A350M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc Graphics 130V remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130V and Arc A350M

Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.

Arc A350M
The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the Arc A350M reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the Arc A350M uses Generation 12.7, both on 3 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 768 (Arc A350M). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,510 | 4,500 |
| Architecture | Xe² | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 768+10871% |
| Boost Clock | 1850 MHz+61% | 1150 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Arc A350M has 4 GB. The Arc A350M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V) vs Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Intel Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | Intel Media Engine |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | Intel Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the Arc A350M's 25W — a 50% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 350W (Arc A350M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-40% | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 300.7+67% | 180.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | — |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | DG2-128 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #463 | #418 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















