GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon R9 Nano
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 Nano
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Nano lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 381.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 Nano.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+381.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-381.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $200), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 381.1% better value per dollar than the Radeon R9 Nano.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+381.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon R9 Nano
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Radeon R9 Nano
The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 4,609 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 381.1%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+381% | 4,609 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+44% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+148% | 8.192 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+73% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184 | 256+39% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+480% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Nano relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Nano has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Nano) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 Nano. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 512 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 4096-bit+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (Radeon R9 Nano). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Nano). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 22.8% difference. The Radeon R9 Nano is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 152mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 175W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 152mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+283% | 26.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649 and now averages $200. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 23.0 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 382.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-23% | $649 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+382% | 23.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Fiji |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 27 2015 |
| Ranking | #63 | #306 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon R9 Nano
