
GeForce MX550

Quadro K4200
GeForce MX550 vs Quadro K4200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX550 vs Quadro K4200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce MX550 vs Quadro K4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX550
2021Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Quadro K4200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX550 is the less risky modern option long term.
- β Draws 25W instead of 108W, a 83W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Quadro K4200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βOlder hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quadro K4200
2014Why buy it
- β 5.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- β2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β332% higher power demand at 108W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX550 vs Quadro K4200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX550
The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.

Quadro K4200
The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX550 scores 4,480 and the Quadro K4200 reaches 4,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX550 is built on Turing while the Quadro K4200 uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce MX550) vs 1,344 (Quadro K4200). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce MX550) vs 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200). Boost clocks: 1320 MHz vs 784 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,480+3% | 4,332 |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1344+31% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+28% | 2.107 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1320 MHz+68% | 784 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 112+250% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+1718% | 0.11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX550 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K4200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX550 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4200 carries 4 GB. Quadro K4200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX550 and 64-bit on the Quadro K4200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX550) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) β the GeForce MX550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX550 draws 25W versus the Quadro K4200's 108W β a 124.8% difference. The GeForce MX550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX550) vs 350W (Quadro K4200). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-77% | 108W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | β | 241mm |
| Slots | β | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 179.2+347% | 40.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX550 came in at $150, while the Quadro K4200 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro K4200 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.9 (GeForce MX550) vs Infinity (Quadro K4200) β the Quadro K4200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX550 (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU117S | GK104 |
| Release | December 17 2021 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #468 | #475 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















