
GeForce MX550
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX550 is positioned at rank #187 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX550
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce MX550 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce MX550 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX550 and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

GeForce MX550
The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX550 scores 4,480 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX550 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce MX550) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce MX550) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 1320 MHz vs 1011 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,480 | 4,498 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+4% | 2.588 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1320 MHz+31% | 1011 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+545% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX550 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 0 MB. The GeForce MX550 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX550) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the GeForce MX550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX550 draws 25W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 88.9% difference. The GeForce MX550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX550) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-62% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 179.2+159% | 69.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX550 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.9 (GeForce MX550) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce MX550 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU117S | Polaris 22 |
| Release | December 17 2021 | April 24 2018 |
| Ranking | #468 | #464 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















