Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce MX550
Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:
GeForce MX550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 130V is positioned at rank 302 and the GeForce MX550 is on rank 187, so the GeForce MX550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce MX550 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130V, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 65.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+65.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130V and GeForce MX550
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
GeForce MX550
The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the GeForce MX550 reaches 4,480 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the GeForce MX550 uses Turing, both on 3 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 1,024 (GeForce MX550). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 1320 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,510 | 4,480 |
| Architecture | Xe² | Turing |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 1024+14529% |
| Boost Clock | 1850 MHz+40% | 1320 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX550 has 2 GB. The GeForce MX550 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the GeForce MX550's 25W — a 50% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 350W (GeForce MX550). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-40% | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 300.7+68% | 179.2 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the GeForce MX550 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce MX550 costs 40% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 29.9 (GeForce MX550) — the GeForce MX550 offers 66.1% better value. The Arc Graphics 130V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $150-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $150-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 29.9+66% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | TU117S |
| Release | September 24 2024 | December 17 2021 |
| Ranking | #463 | #468 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130V and GeForce MX550
