
Arc Graphics 130V

GeForce MX550
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce MX550 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce MX550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce MX550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 130V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe² (2024) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
GeForce MX550
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Arc Graphics 130V is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce MX550 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce MX550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.

GeForce MX550
The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the GeForce MX550 reaches 4,480 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the GeForce MX550 uses Turing, both on 3 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 1,024 (GeForce MX550). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 1320 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,510 | 4,480 |
| Architecture | Xe² | Turing |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 1024+14529% |
| Boost Clock | 1850 MHz+40% | 1320 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX550 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc Graphics 130V leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX550 carries 2 GB. GeForce MX550 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130V and 64-bit on the GeForce MX550.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the GeForce MX550's 25W — a 50% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 350W (GeForce MX550). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-40% | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 300.7+68% | 179.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 130V came in at $300, while the GeForce MX550 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce MX550 was 50% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 29.9 (GeForce MX550) — the GeForce MX550 offers 99.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130V (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130V | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $150-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 29.9+99% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | TU117S |
| Release | September 24 2024 | December 17 2021 |
| Ranking | #463 | #468 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















