Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce MX550

Intel

Arc Graphics 130V

2024Boost: 1850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce MX550

2021Core: 1065 MHzBoost: 1320 MHz
Similar parts
·

Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce MX550 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce MX550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 130V

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
  • More future proof: Xe² (2024) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 100% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

GeForce MX550

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 98.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Arc Graphics 130V is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce MX550 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc Graphics 130V is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (4,510 vs 4,480), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce MX550 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX550 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 98.7% (29.9 vs 15.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Arc Graphics 130V still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce MX550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 130V

The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX550

The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130V scores 4,510 and the GeForce MX550 reaches 4,480 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130V is built on Xe² while the GeForce MX550 uses Turing, both on 3 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 1,024 (GeForce MX550). Boost clocks: 1850 MHz vs 1320 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VGeForce MX550
G3D Mark Score
4,510
4,480
Architecture
Xe²
Turing
Process Node
3 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
7
1024+14529%
Boost Clock
1850 MHz+40%
1320 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX550 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc Graphics 130V leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VGeForce MX550
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX550 carries 2 GB. GeForce MX550 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130V and 64-bit on the GeForce MX550.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VGeForce MX550
VRAM Capacity
Shared
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
80 GB/s
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130V draws 15W versus the GeForce MX550's 25W — a 50% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 350W (GeForce MX550). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.

FeatureArc Graphics 130VGeForce MX550
TDP
15W-40%
25W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
300.7+68%
179.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 130V came in at $300, while the GeForce MX550 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce MX550 was 50% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) vs 29.9 (GeForce MX550) — the GeForce MX550 offers 99.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130V (2024 vs 2021).

FeatureArc Graphics 130VGeForce MX550
MSRP
$300
$150-50%
Performance per Dollar
15.0
29.9+99%
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
TU117S
Release
September 24 2024
December 17 2021
Ranking
#463
#468

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.