
GeForce MX550 vs Quadro P1000

GeForce MX550
Popular choices:

Quadro P1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX550 is positioned at rank #187 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX550
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX550 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce MX550 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P1000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX550.
| Insight | GeForce MX550 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P1000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $150 for the GeForce MX550, it costs 47% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 88.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX550 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+88.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX550 and Quadro P1000

GeForce MX550
The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.

Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX550 scores 4,480 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX550 is built on Turing while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce MX550) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce MX550) vs 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 1320 MHz vs 1519 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,480 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+60% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+74% | 1.555 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1320 MHz | 1519 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+953% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX550 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P1000 has 4 GB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX550) vs 1 MB (Quadro P1000) — the GeForce MX550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX550 draws 25W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce MX550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX550) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-38% | 40W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 179.2+59% | 112.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX550 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Quadro P1000 launched at $0 and now averages $80. The Quadro P1000 costs 46.7% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.9 (GeForce MX550) vs 56.2 (Quadro P1000) — the Quadro P1000 offers 88% better value. The GeForce MX550 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $80-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.9 | 56.2+88% |
| Codename | TU117S | GP107 |
| Release | December 17 2021 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #468 | #466 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












