
GeForce MX550 vs GRID P6-4Q

GeForce MX550
Popular choices:

GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX550 is positioned at rank 187 and the GRID P6-4Q is on rank 280, so the GeForce MX550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX550
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-4Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX550 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The GeForce MX550 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P6-4Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P6-4Q.
| Insight | GeForce MX550 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1.2% better value per dollar than the GRID P6-4Q.
| Insight | GeForce MX550 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX550 and GRID P6-4Q

GeForce MX550
The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.

GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX550 scores 4,480 and the GRID P6-4Q reaches 4,429 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX550 is built on Turing while the GRID P6-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce MX550) vs 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce MX550) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q).
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,480+1% | 4,429 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+22% | 2.218 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 96+200% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+257% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX550 draws 25W versus the GRID P6-4Q's 100W — a 120% difference. The GeForce MX550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX550) vs 350W (GRID P6-4Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-75% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 179.2+305% | 44.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX550 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GRID P6-4Q launched at $2000 and now averages $150. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.9 (GeForce MX550) vs 29.5 (GRID P6-4Q) — the GeForce MX550 offers 1.4% better value. The GeForce MX550 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce MX550 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-93% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.9+1% | 29.5 |
| Codename | TU117S | GM204 |
| Release | December 17 2021 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #468 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















