FirePro S7000 vs GeForce MX550

FirePro S7000

2012Core: 950 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce MX550

2021Core: 1065 MHzBoost: 1320 MHz

FirePro S7000 vs GeForce MX550 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7000 vs GeForce MX550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7000

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 732.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,249 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 500% higher power demand at 150W vs 25W.

GeForce MX550

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,099 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
  • Delivers 724.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
  • FirePro S7000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX550 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 25W instead of 150W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro S7000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (4,524 vs 4,480), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce MX550 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX550 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,099 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $1,249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 724.6% (29.9 vs 3.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. FirePro S7000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro S7000 vs GeForce MX550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX550

The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7000 scores 4,524 and the GeForce MX550 reaches 4,480 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce MX550 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro S7000) vs 1,024 (GeForce MX550). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce MX550).

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce MX550
G3D Mark Score
4,524
4,480
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1280+25%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS+11%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+150%
32
L1 Cache
0.31 MB
2 MB+545%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX550 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro S7000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce MX550
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX550 carries 2 GB. FirePro S7000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7000 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX550. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7000) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX550) — the GeForce MX550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce MX550
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7000 draws 150W versus the GeForce MX550's 25W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce MX550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7000) vs 350W (GeForce MX550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce MX550
TDP
150W
25W-83%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
292mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
30.2
179.2+493%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7000 came in at $1249, while the GeForce MX550 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce MX550 was 88% cheaper ($1099 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (FirePro S7000) vs 29.9 (GeForce MX550) — the GeForce MX550 offers 730.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX550 (2021 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro S7000GeForce MX550
MSRP
$1249
$150-88%
Performance per Dollar
3.6
29.9+731%
Codename
Pitcairn
TU117S
Release
August 27 2012
December 17 2021
Ranking
#462
#468

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.