
FirePro S7000
Popular choices:

GeForce MX550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro S7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌732.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,249 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌500% higher power demand at 150W vs 25W.
GeForce MX550
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,099 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 724.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro S7000: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro S7000 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 150W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
FirePro S7000
2012GeForce MX550
2021Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,099 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 724.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro S7000: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro S7000 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 150W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌732.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,249 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌500% higher power demand at 150W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro S7000 better than GeForce MX550?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce MX550 make more sense than FirePro S7000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 27 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7000 and GeForce MX550

FirePro S7000
FirePro S7000
The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

GeForce MX550
GeForce MX550
The GeForce MX550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,480 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S7000 scores 4,524 and the GeForce MX550 reaches 4,480 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce MX550 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro S7000) vs 1,024 (GeForce MX550). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce MX550).
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,524 | 4,480 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+25% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+11% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 2 MB+545% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX550 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro S7000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S7000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX550 has 2 GB. The FirePro S7000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7000) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX550) — the GeForce MX550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S7000 draws 150W versus the GeForce MX550's 25W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce MX550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7000) vs 350W (GeForce MX550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 25W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 292mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.2 | 179.2+493% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S7000 launched at $1249 MSRP, while the GeForce MX550 launched at $150. The GeForce MX550 costs 88% less ($1099 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (FirePro S7000) vs 29.9 (GeForce MX550) — the GeForce MX550 offers 730.6% better value. The GeForce MX550 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1249 | $150-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.6 | 29.9+731% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | TU117S |
| Release | August 27 2012 | December 17 2021 |
| Ranking | #462 | #468 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













