FirePro S7000
VS
Radeon R9 370

FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 370

FirePro S7000

2012Core: 950 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro S7000 is positioned at rank #241 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7000

#102
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500
88%
#103
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
81%
#104
Radeon Pro W6900X
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000
80%
#105
Quadro RTX 6000
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800
78%
#226
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
4081%
#241
FirePro S7000
MSRP: $1249|Avg: $40
100%
#242
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
99%
#243
FirePro V7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $100
97%
#244
Quadro P500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
92%
#246
FireStream 9370
MSRP: $800|Avg: $50
87%
#247
GRID K260Q
MSRP: $937|Avg: $15
87%
#249
Quadro 600
MSRP: $179|Avg: $20
81%
#251
Quadro 410
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
79%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
78%
#254
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
75%
#255
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
75%
#256
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
75%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro S7000.

InsightFirePro S7000Radeon R9 370
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%)
Leading raw performance (+4.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (292mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro S7000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro S7000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $55), it costs 27% less, resulting in a 31.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro S7000Radeon R9 370
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+31.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 370

AMD

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

AMD

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7000 scores 4,524 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro S7000) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370).

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon R9 370
G3D Mark Score
4,524
4,722+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.432 TFLOPS
2.496 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L1 Cache
320 KB
384 KB+20%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon R9 370
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon R9 370
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (FirePro S7000) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon R9 370
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S7000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro S7000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon R9 370
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264
H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R9 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7000) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 292mm vs 221mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon R9 370
TDP
150W
110W-27%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
292mm
221mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
85
75-12%
Perf/Watt
30.2
42.9+42%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S7000 launched at $1249 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149 and now averages $55. The FirePro S7000 costs 27.3% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 113.1 (FirePro S7000) vs 85.9 (Radeon R9 370) — the FirePro S7000 offers 31.7% better value. The Radeon R9 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro S7000Radeon R9 370
MSRP
$1249
$149-88%
Avg Price (30d)
$40-27%
$55
Performance per Dollar
113.1+32%
85.9
Codename
Pitcairn
Trinidad
Release
August 27 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#462
#456