
FirePro S7000

Radeon R9 370
FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌738.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,249 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.
- ❌32.1% longer card at 292mm vs 221mm.
Radeon R9 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 774.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 292mm, a 71mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S7000
The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Radeon R9 370
The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S7000 scores 4,524 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro S7000) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370).
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,524 | 4,722+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS | 2.496 TFLOPS+3% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 384 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7000 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 370.
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (FirePro S7000) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S7000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro S7000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R9 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7000) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 292mm vs 221mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 110W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 292mm | 221mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 30.2 | 42.9+42% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro S7000 came in at $1249, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R9 370 was 88.1% cheaper ($1100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (FirePro S7000) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 780.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 370 (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1249 | $149-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.6 | 31.7+781% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Trinidad |
| Release | August 27 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #462 | #456 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















