FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Sky 500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Sky 500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Sky 500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7000

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
149.8% HIGHER MSRP
$1,249 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Radeon Sky 500

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $749 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 160.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Sky 500 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.4% in PassMark G3D (4,723 vs 4,524), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro S7000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Sky 500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $749 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $1,249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 160.8% (9.4 vs 3.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Sky 500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro S7000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Sky 500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Radeon Sky 500

The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7000 scores 4,524 and the Radeon Sky 500 reaches 4,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro S7000) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).

Feature	FirePro S7000	Radeon Sky 500
G3D Mark Score	4,524	4,723+4%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.432 TFLOPS	2.432 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L1 Cache	320 KB	320 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro S7000	Radeon Sky 500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Sky 500 carries 2 GB. FirePro S7000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7000 and 64-bit on the Radeon Sky 500.

Feature	FirePro S7000	Radeon Sky 500
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7000 draws 150W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Sky 500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7000) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro S7000	Radeon Sky 500
TDP	150W	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	292mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	30.2	31.5+4%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7000 came in at $1249, while the Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500. On MSRP, Radeon Sky 500 was 60% cheaper ($749 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (FirePro S7000) vs 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon Sky 500 offers 161.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Sky 500 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro S7000	Radeon Sky 500
MSRP	$1249	$500-60%
Performance per Dollar	3.6	9.4+161%
Codename	Pitcairn	Pitcairn
Release	August 27 2012	March 27 2013
Ranking	#462	#455

Search FirePro S7000 on Amazon

Search Radeon Sky 500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.