FirePro S7000 vs GRID T4-8Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7000 vs GRID T4-8Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro S7000 vs GRID T4-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7000

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,251 less on MSRP ($1,249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 90.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($1,249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

GRID T4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$1,249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID T4-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.3% in PassMark G3D (4,762 vs 4,524), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro S7000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro S7000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,251 cheaper on MSRP at $1,249 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 90.2% (3.6 vs 1.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID T4-8Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro S7000 vs GRID T4-8Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S7000

The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.

GRID T4-8Q

The GRID T4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,762 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro S7000 scores 4,524 versus the GRID T4-8Q's 4,762 — the GRID T4-8Q leads by 5.3%. The FirePro S7000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID T4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro S7000) vs 1,536 (GRID T4-8Q). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID T4-8Q).

Feature	FirePro S7000	GRID T4-8Q
G3D Mark Score	4,524	4,762+5%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	1536+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.432 TFLOPS+10%	2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	96+20%
L1 Cache	320 KB	576 KB+80%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro S7000	GRID T4-8Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID T4-8Q carries 2 GB. FirePro S7000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7000 and 64-bit on the GRID T4-8Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7000) vs 2 MB (GRID T4-8Q) — the GRID T4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro S7000	GRID T4-8Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7000 draws 150W versus the GRID T4-8Q's 100W — a 40% difference. The GRID T4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7000) vs 350W (GRID T4-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro S7000	GRID T4-8Q
TDP	150W	100W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	292mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	30.2	47.6+58%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7000 came in at $1249, while the GRID T4-8Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, FirePro S7000 was 50% cheaper ($1251 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (FirePro S7000) vs 1.9 (GRID T4-8Q) — the FirePro S7000 offers 89.5% better value. The newer card here is GRID T4-8Q (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro S7000	GRID T4-8Q
MSRP	$1249-50%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	3.6+89%	1.9
Codename	Pitcairn	GM204
Release	August 27 2012	August 30 2015
Ranking	#462	#535

Search FirePro S7000 on Amazon

Search GRID T4-8Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.