Quadro K4200 vs Tesla K20c

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4200 vs Tesla K20c FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4200 vs Tesla K20c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4200

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 108W instead of 225W, a 117W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).

Tesla K20c

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌108.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 108W.
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla K20c is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (4,432 vs 4,332), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K4200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla K20c makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla K20c is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K4200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K4200 vs Tesla K20c Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4200

The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Tesla K20c

The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4200 scores 4,332 and the Tesla K20c reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4200 is built on Kepler while the Tesla K20c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K4200) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20c). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c).

Feature	Quadro K4200	Tesla K20c
G3D Mark Score	4,332	4,432+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344	2496+86%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.107 TFLOPS	3.524 TFLOPS+67%
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	112	208+86%
L1 Cache	112 KB	208 KB+86%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.25 MB+150%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4200	Tesla K20c
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20c carries 2 GB. Quadro K4200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4200 and 64-bit on the Tesla K20c. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) — the Tesla K20c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Tesla K20c
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.25 MB+150%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Quadro K4200) vs 11_0 (Tesla K20c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Tesla K20c
DirectX	12_0+9%	11_0
Max Displays	3	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4200 draws 108W versus the Tesla K20c's 225W — a 70.3% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4200) vs 350W (Tesla K20c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Tesla K20c
TDP	108W-52%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	267mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Perf/Watt	40.1+104%	19.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4200 came in at $0, while the Tesla K20c launched at $3199. On MSRP, Quadro K4200 was 100+% cheaper ($3199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro K4200) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20c) — the Quadro K4200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K4200 (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K4200	Tesla K20c
MSRP	$0-100%	$3199
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	1.4
Codename	GK104	GK110
Release	July 22 2014	November 12 2012
Ranking	#475	#549

Search Quadro K4200 on Amazon

Search Tesla K20c on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.