Quadro K4200 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Quadro K4200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K4200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 628.9% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K4200.
| Insight | Quadro K4200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-628.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+628.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K4200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $590 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, it costs 92% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 61.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K4200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+61.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4200 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Quadro K4200
The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro K4200 scores 4,332 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 628.9%. The Quadro K4200 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K4200) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,332 | 31,578+629% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 7680+471% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.107 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+1803% |
| Boost Clock | 784 MHz | 2610 MHz+233% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 112 | 240+114% |
| L1 Cache | 0.11 MB | 7.5 MB+6718% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 48 MB+9500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K4200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 48 MB+9500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Quadro K4200) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K4200) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen).
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | — | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4200 draws 108W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 90.1% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4200) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 285mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W-62% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 40.1 | 110.8+176% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K4200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The Quadro K4200 costs 91.5% less ($540 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 86.6 (Quadro K4200) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the Quadro K4200 offers 61.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-92% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.6+62% | 53.5 |
| Codename | GK104 | AD104 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #475 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K4200 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
