Quadro K4200
Tesla K20m
Quadro K4200 vs Tesla K20m Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K4200 vs Tesla K20m FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Quadro K4200 vs Tesla K20m: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K4200
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 108W instead of 225W, a 117W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
Tesla K20m
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 108W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K4200 vs Tesla K20m Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro K4200
The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.
Tesla K20m
The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K4200 scores 4,332 and the Tesla K20m reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4200 is built on Kepler while the Tesla K20m uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K4200) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20m). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20m).
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,332 | 4,432+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 2496+86% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.107 TFLOPS | 3.524 TFLOPS+67% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 112 | 208+86% |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 208 KB+86% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.25 MB+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20m carries 2 GB. Quadro K4200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4200 and 64-bit on the Tesla K20m. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) — the Tesla K20m has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.25 MB+150% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4200 draws 108W versus the Tesla K20m's 225W — a 70.3% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4200) vs 350W (Tesla K20m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W-52% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 40.1+104% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro K4200 came in at $0, while the Tesla K20m launched at $3199. On MSRP, Quadro K4200 was 100+% cheaper ($3199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro K4200) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20m) — the Quadro K4200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K4200 (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $3199 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 1.4 |
| Codename | GK104 | GK110 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | January 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #475 | #470 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K4200 and Tesla K20m
