Quadro K4200 vs Radeon R9 270

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K4200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 270.

Insight	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 270 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 270 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 65.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+65.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K4200 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 270 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4200 and Radeon R9 270

Quadro K4200

The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4200 scores 4,332 and the Radeon R9 270 reaches 4,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 270 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K4200) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200) vs 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270
G3D Mark Score	4,332	4,306
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344+5%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.107 TFLOPS	2.368 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock	784 MHz	925 MHz+18%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112+40%	80
L1 Cache	112 KB	320 KB+186%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 has 2 GB. The Quadro K4200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4200 draws 108W versus the Radeon R9 270's 150W — a 32.6% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4200) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon R9 270
TDP	108W-28%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	241mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	40.1+40%	28.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K4200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 270 launched at $179 and now averages $30. The Radeon R9 270 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 86.6 (Quadro K4200) vs 143.5 (Radeon R9 270) — the Radeon R9 270 offers 65.7% better value. The Quadro K4200 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).