Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U vs Quadro M2000
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Popular choices:
Quadro M2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U, it costs 89% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 757.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+757.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U and Quadro M2000
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,225 points. Launch price was $579.
Quadro M2000
The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U scores 4,225 and the Quadro M2000 reaches 4,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro M2000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 768 (Quadro M2000). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 1163 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,225+5% | 4,026 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+400% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.17 TFLOPS+805% | 1.786 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2105 MHz+81% | 1163 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+400% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+167% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000 has 4 GB. The Quadro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2000) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U draws 250W versus the Quadro M2000's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 350W (Quadro M2000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 167mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.9 | 53.7+218% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the Quadro M2000 launched at $0 and now averages $50. The Quadro M2000 costs 88.9% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.4 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) vs 80.5 (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 offers 756.4% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $50-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.4 | 80.5+756% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GM206 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | April 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #65 | #491 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U and Quadro M2000
