Radeon Sky 500 vs Radeon R9 Nano
Radeon Sky 500
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 Nano
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Sky 500 is positioned at rank #146 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Sky 500
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Sky 500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 Nano.
| Insight | Radeon Sky 500 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 Nano offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 Nano holds the technical lead. Priced at $200 (vs $500), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 144% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Sky 500 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+144%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Sky 500 and Radeon R9 Nano
Radeon Sky 500
The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.
Radeon R9 Nano
The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Sky 500 scores 4,723 and the Radeon R9 Nano reaches 4,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Sky 500 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano).
| Feature | Radeon Sky 500 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,723+2% | 4,609 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 4096+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.432 TFLOPS | 8.192 TFLOPS+237% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 1 MB+223% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Sky 500 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon Sky 500) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon R9 Nano has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Sky 500 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 4096-bit+6300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Sky 500 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon Sky 500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Sky 500) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Sky 500 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-14% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 152mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.5+20% | 26.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649 and now averages $200. The Radeon R9 Nano costs 60% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) vs 23.0 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon R9 Nano offers 144.7% better value. The Radeon R9 Nano is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Sky 500 | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-23% | $649 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $200-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.4 | 23.0+145% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Fiji |
| Release | March 27 2013 | August 27 2015 |
| Ranking | #455 | #306 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Sky 500 and Radeon R9 Nano
