
Radeon Vega 3 3020e vs Radeon R5 M255

Radeon Vega 3 3020e
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 M255
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M255
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 3 3020e uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Vega 3 3020e likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 M255 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 M255 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Vega 3 3020e.
| Insight | Radeon Vega 3 3020e | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R5 M255 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Vega 3 3020e and Radeon R5 M255

Radeon Vega 3 3020e
The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 535 points.

Radeon R5 M255
The Radeon R5 M255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $799.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Vega 3 3020e scores 535 and the Radeon R5 M255 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon R5 M255 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 640 (Radeon R5 M255). Raw compute: 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M255). Boost clocks: 1283 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 3020e | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 535 | 543+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.284 TFLOPS+177% | 1.184 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1283 MHz+39% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 3020e | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Vega 3 3020e comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M255 has 4 GB. The Radeon R5 M255 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 M255) — the Radeon Vega 3 3020e has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 3020e | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M255). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 3020e | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 1.0 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R5 M255). Decoder: VCN 1.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R5 M255).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 3020e | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 1.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 1.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Vega 3 3020e draws 100W versus the Radeon R5 M255's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R5 M255 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M255). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 3020e | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.3 | 7.2+36% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Vega 3 3020e launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R5 M255 launched at $150 and now averages $30. The Radeon Vega 3 3020e costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 18.1 (Radeon R5 M255) — the Radeon Vega 3 3020e offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 3 3020e | Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 18.1 |
| Codename | Vega 12 | Venus |
| Release | November 14 2018 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #435 | #851 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















