Radeon Vega 3 3020e
VS
Radeon R7 M260

Radeon Vega 3 3020e vs Radeon R7 M260

AMD

Radeon Vega 3 3020e

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1283 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M260

2015Core: 620 MHzBoost: 715 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M260

#476
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2267%
#478
2055%
#479
2049%
#483
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1863%
#484
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1851%
#486
Radeon R7 M260
MSRP: $110|Avg: $110
100%
#487
100%
#488
Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP: $155|Avg: $30
100%
#489
100%
#490
Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#491
99%
#492
Radeon HD 6450A
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#493
98%
#494
98%
#495
94%
#496
Radeon HD 8180
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
94%
#499
Radeon R8 M535DX
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#500
Radeon R5 230
MSRP: $50|Avg: $25
93%
#501
GeForce 9300 GE
MSRP: $23|Avg: $25
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Vega 3 3020e uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Vega 3 3020e likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 M260 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M260 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon Vega 3 3020eRadeon R7 M260
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Vega 3 3020e remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Vega 3 3020e and Radeon R7 M260

AMD

Radeon Vega 3 3020e

The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 535 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M260

The Radeon R7 M260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 527 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Vega 3 3020e scores 535 and the Radeon R7 M260 reaches 527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon R7 M260 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260). Raw compute: 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260). Boost clocks: 1283 MHz vs 715 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Vega 3 3020eRadeon R7 M260
G3D Mark Score
535+2%
527
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+233%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.284 TFLOPS+498%
0.5491 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1283 MHz+79%
715 MHz
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+233%
96 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Vega 3 3020eRadeon R7 M260
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Vega 3 3020e comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260 has 4 GB. The Radeon R7 M260 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M260) — the Radeon Vega 3 3020e has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Vega 3 3020eRadeon R7 M260
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R7 M260). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon Vega 3 3020eRadeon R7 M260
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (FL11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 1.0 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M260). Decoder: VCN 1.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 M260).

FeatureRadeon Vega 3 3020eRadeon R7 M260
Encoder
VCN 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
VCN 1.0
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Vega 3 3020e draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 M260's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R7 M260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon Vega 3 3020eRadeon R7 M260
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
5.3
7.0+32%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Vega 3 3020e launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R7 M260 launched at $110 and now averages $110. The Radeon Vega 3 3020e costs 100+% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 M260) — the Radeon Vega 3 3020e offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Vega 3 3020eRadeon R7 M260
MSRP
$0-100%
$110
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$110
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
4.8
Codename
Vega 12
Opal
Release
November 14 2018
December 6 2015
Ranking
#435
#878