
Radeon Vega 8 vs FirePro M4000

Radeon Vega 8
Popular choices:

FirePro M4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Vega 8 is positioned at rank #363 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Vega 8
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 8 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2012). The Radeon Vega 8 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro M4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Vega 8.
| Insight | Radeon Vega 8 | FirePro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $40 for the Radeon Vega 8, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 35.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Vega 8 | FirePro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+35.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Vega 8 and FirePro M4000

Radeon Vega 8
The Radeon Vega 8 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,569 points.

FirePro M4000
The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Vega 8 scores 1,569 and the FirePro M4000 reaches 1,596 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Vega 8 is built on GCN 5.1 while the FirePro M4000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Radeon Vega 8) vs 512 (FirePro M4000). Raw compute: 1.702 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 8) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 8 | FirePro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,569 | 1,596+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 512+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.702 TFLOPS+146% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 28 | 32+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Vega 8 | FirePro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Vega 8 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M4000 has 2 GB. The FirePro M4000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 8 | FirePro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Vega 8 draws 45W versus the FirePro M4000's 33W — a 30.8% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Vega 8) vs 350W (FirePro M4000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 8 | FirePro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 33W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 82mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 34.9 | 48.4+39% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Vega 8 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro M4000 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The FirePro M4000 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.2 (Radeon Vega 8) vs 53.2 (FirePro M4000) — the FirePro M4000 offers 35.7% better value. The Radeon Vega 8 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 8 | FirePro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $30-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.2 | 53.2+36% |
| Codename | Cezanne | Chelsea |
| Release | April 13 2021 | June 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #601 | #752 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















