Radeon Vega 9 vs Quadro K2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

98%

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

89%

#245

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5596%

#260

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

100%

#261

Quadro K2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

100%

#263

FirePro 3D V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $30

97%

#264

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

95%

#265

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

95%

#266

GRID M40

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

95%

#267

FirePro V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

94%

#268

FirePro V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $15

94%

#269

FirePro 3D V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $40

93%

#270

FirePro S9050

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825

93%

#271

FirePro R5000

MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150

91%

#272

GRID M6-8Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

90%

#275

GRID K120Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $20

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Vega 9 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The Radeon Vega 9 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Vega 9 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Vega 9	Quadro K2000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Longevity	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Vega 9 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Vega 9 Benchmark Check

Quadro K2000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Vega 9 and Quadro K2000

Radeon Vega 9

The Radeon Vega 9 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,588 points.

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Vega 9 scores 1,588 and the Quadro K2000 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Vega 9 is built on GCN 5.1 while the Quadro K2000 uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Radeon Vega 9) vs 384 (Quadro K2000). Raw compute: 1.702 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 9) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000).

Feature	Radeon Vega 9	Quadro K2000
G3D Mark Score	1,588	1,582
Architecture	GCN 5.1	Kepler
Process Node	7 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448+17%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.702 TFLOPS+132%	0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	28	32+14%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Vega 9	Quadro K2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Vega 9 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000 has 2 GB. The Quadro K2000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon Vega 9	Quadro K2000
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 9) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Vega 9	Quadro K2000
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega 9) vs NVENC 1st gen (Quadro K2000). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon Vega 9) vs H.264 (Quadro K2000).

Feature	Radeon Vega 9	Quadro K2000
Encoder	VCE 4.0	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	UVD 7.0	NVDEC 1st gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Vega 9 draws 45W versus the Quadro K2000's 51W — a 12.5% difference. The Radeon Vega 9 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Vega 9) vs 350W (Quadro K2000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 202mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon Vega 9	Quadro K2000
TDP	45W-12%	51W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	202mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	35.3+14%	31.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Vega 9 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro K2000 launched at $599 and now averages $500. The Radeon Vega 9 costs 100+% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Vega 9) vs 3.2 (Quadro K2000) — the Radeon Vega 9 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 9 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).