GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Quadro K2000
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Quadro K2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 692.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K2000.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+692.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-692.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $500 for the Quadro K2000, it costs 58% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1795.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1795.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($209) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Quadro K2000
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Quadro K2000
The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Quadro K2000's 1,582 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 692.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro K2000 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 384 (Quadro K2000). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+692% | 1,582 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+567% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+1142% | 0.7327 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+8233% | 0.03 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K2000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro K2000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs NVENC 1st gen (Quadro K2000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264 (Quadro K2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Quadro K2000's 51W — a 87.3% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 350W (Quadro K2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 202mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 51W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 202mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-6% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+211% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the Quadro K2000 launched at $599 and now averages $500. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 58.2% less ($291 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 3.2 (Quadro K2000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 1775% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-58% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209-58% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+1775% | 3.2 |
| Codename | GA106 | GK107 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #211 | #756 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Quadro K2000
