Radeon X1050 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9800

#726

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

54285%

#728

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

49210%

#729

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

49080%

#733

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

44630%

#734

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

44325%

#736

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

100%

#737

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

100%

#738

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

80%

#739

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

75%

#741

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

50%

#742

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

50%

#743

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

40%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

30%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

30%

#746

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

25%

#747

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

20%

#748

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

20%

#749

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

15%

#750

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

15%

#751

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

15%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon X1050 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2010). The Radeon X1050 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9800.

Insight	Radeon X1050	MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+6.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.5%)
Longevity	RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $49 for the Radeon X1050, it costs 49% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 84% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon X1050	MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+84%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)	✅More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon X1050 Benchmark Check

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1050 and MOBILITY RADEON 9800

Radeon X1050

The Radeon X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 46 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1050 scores 49 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9800's 46 — the Radeon X1050 leads by 6.5%. The Radeon X1050 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon X1050) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon X1050) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9800).

Feature	Radeon X1050	MOBILITY RADEON 9800
G3D Mark Score	49+7%	46
Architecture	RDNA 3.5	TeraScale 2
Process Node	4 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2048+156%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.47 TFLOPS+924%	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+220%	40
L2 Cache	8 MB+3100%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon X1050	MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon X1050) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) — the Radeon X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon X1050	MOBILITY RADEON 9800
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	8 MB+3100%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0b (Radeon X1050) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon X1050	MOBILITY RADEON 9800
DirectX	9_0b	9.0b
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1050 draws 55W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9800's 50W — a 9.5% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1050) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon X1050	MOBILITY RADEON 9800
TDP	55W	50W-9%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	165mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	0.9	0.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1050 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 launched at $229 and now averages $25. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 costs 49% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.0 (Radeon X1050) vs 1.8 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 offers 80% better value. The Radeon X1050 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2010).