Radeon X1050 vs Quadro FX 350M
Radeon X1050
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 350M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1050 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2008). The Radeon X1050 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 350M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 350M.
| Insight | Radeon X1050 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon X1050 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1050 and Quadro FX 350M
Radeon X1050
The Radeon X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Quadro FX 350M
The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1050 scores 49 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the Radeon X1050 leads by 8.9%. The Radeon X1050 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon X1050) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon X1050) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).
| Feature | Radeon X1050 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 49+9% | 45 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+753% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.47 TFLOPS+1744% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+3100% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1050 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon X1050) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 350M) — the Radeon X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1050 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+3100% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0b (Radeon X1050) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon X1050 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0b | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1050 draws 55W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 109.8% difference. The Radeon X1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1050) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon X1050 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-71% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9+350% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1050 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon X1050 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Codename | Strix Halo | GT200B |
| Release | January 6 2025 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #126 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1050 and Quadro FX 350M
