Radeon X1250 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon X1250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 13.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1250.

Insight	Radeon X1250	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-13.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+13.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon X1250, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 85.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon X1250	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+85.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon X1250 Benchmark Check

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1250 and RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

Radeon X1250

The Radeon X1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points. Launch price was $79.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1250 scores 37 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 leads by 13.5%. The Radeon X1250 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon X1250) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1250) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

Feature	Radeon X1250	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
G3D Mark Score	37	42+14%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	RDNA 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	512	4096+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.211 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+3850%
Boost Clock	1183 MHz	2920 MHz+147%
ROPs	16	128+700%
TMUs	32	256+700%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon X1250	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon X1250) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon X1250	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (Radeon X1250) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon X1250	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
DirectX	9.0b	9.0
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	2.0	2.0
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1250) vs None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Decoder: Avivo vs VideoShader. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (Radeon X1250) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700).

Feature	Radeon X1250	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Encoder	Avivo	None
Decoder	Avivo	VideoShader
Codecs	MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1250 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon X1250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1250) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 175mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70.

Feature	Radeon X1250	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
TDP	50W-83%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	0mm	175mm
Height	0mm	100mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	70	70
Perf/Watt	0.7+600%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1250 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.8 (Radeon X1250) vs 1.4 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers 75% better value. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).