
Radeon X1250

Radeon Xpress 1300M
Radeon X1250 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon X1250 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon X1250 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon X1250
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (37 vs 40).
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon Xpress 1300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅+8.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Radeon X1250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Xpress 1300M is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1250 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon X1250
The Radeon X1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon Xpress 1300M
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1250 scores 37 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 40 — the Radeon Xpress 1300M leads by 8.1%. The Radeon X1250 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon X1250) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1250) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 37 | 40+8% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1280+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS | 3.2 TFLOPS+164% |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz | 1250 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon X1250 and 64-bit on the Radeon Xpress 1300M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon X1250) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1250) vs None (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Decoder: Avivo vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (Radeon X1250) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300M).
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | None |
| Decoder | Avivo | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1250 draws 50W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W — a 51.9% difference. The Radeon X1250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1250) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-41% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7+40% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Xpress 1300M (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | Lexa | Navi 14 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #668 | #403 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














