CPU
GPU
Radeon X1250
Popular choices:
RADEON 9550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9550.
| Insight | Radeon X1250 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the RADEON 9550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $49), it costs 39% less, resulting in a 54.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1250 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1250 and RADEON 9550
Radeon X1250
The Radeon X1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points. Launch price was $79.
RADEON 9550
The RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1250 scores 37 versus the RADEON 9550's 35 — the Radeon X1250 leads by 5.7%. The Radeon X1250 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RADEON 9550 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon X1250) vs 512 (RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1250) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 9550). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 37+6% | 35 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1250 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9550 has 256 MB. The Radeon X1250 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1250 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9550's 50W — a 0% difference. The RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1250) vs 350W (RADEON 9550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1250 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON 9550 launched at $129 and now averages $30. The RADEON 9550 costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.8 (Radeon X1250) vs 1.2 (RADEON 9550) — the RADEON 9550 offers 50% better value.
| Feature | Radeon X1250 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $30-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 1.2+50% |
| Codename | Lexa | Lexa |
| Release | April 20 2017 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #668 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1250 and RADEON 9550
