Radeon X1650 GTO vs Mobility Radeon X2500
Radeon X1650 GTO
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon X2500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1650 GTO is positioned at rank 352 and the Mobility Radeon X2500 is on rank 668, so the Radeon X1650 GTO offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 GTO
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X2500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1650 GTO is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The Radeon X1650 GTO likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X2500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon X2500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1650 GTO offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 GTO | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-9.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+9.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon X2500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $20 for the Radeon X1650 GTO, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 45.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 GTO | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+45.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 GTO and Mobility Radeon X2500
Radeon X1650 GTO
The Radeon X1650 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 75 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Mobility Radeon X2500
The Mobility Radeon X2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1650 GTO scores 75 versus the Mobility Radeon X2500's 82 — the Mobility Radeon X2500 leads by 9.3%. The Radeon X1650 GTO is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Mobility Radeon X2500 uses TeraScale 2, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon X1650 GTO) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X2500). Raw compute: 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1650 GTO) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X2500).
| Feature | Radeon X1650 GTO | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 75 | 82+9% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+540% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.8 TFLOPS+2025% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 128+700% | 16 |
| TMUs | 320+700% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+1150% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1650 GTO | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1650 GTO comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X2500 has 256 MB. The Radeon X1650 GTO offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon X1650 GTO) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X2500) — the Radeon X1650 GTO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 GTO | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1650 GTO draws 335W versus the Mobility Radeon X2500's 50W — a 148.1% difference. The Mobility Radeon X2500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 GTO) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X2500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 GTO | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 335W | 50W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 1.6+700% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1650 GTO launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Mobility Radeon X2500 launched at $50 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon X2500 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.8 (Radeon X1650 GTO) vs 5.5 (Mobility Radeon X2500) — the Mobility Radeon X2500 offers 44.7% better value. The Radeon X1650 GTO is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon X1650 GTO | Mobility Radeon X2500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $50-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.8 | 5.5+45% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Broadway |
| Release | May 10 2022 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #25 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1650 GTO and Mobility Radeon X2500
