
Radeon X1800 GTO vs Quadro NVS 420

Radeon X1800 GTO
Popular choices:

Quadro NVS 420
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon X1800 GTO is positioned at rank #348 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1800 GTO
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1800 GTO is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro NVS 420 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon X1800 GTO | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon X1800 GTO offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $20 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2.9% better value per dollar than the Quadro NVS 420.
| Insight | Radeon X1800 GTO | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1800 GTO and Quadro NVS 420

Radeon X1800 GTO
The Radeon X1800 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 141 points. Launch price was $649.

Quadro NVS 420
The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1800 GTO scores 141 and the Quadro NVS 420 reaches 137 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1800 GTO is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro NVS 420 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Radeon X1800 GTO) vs 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420). Raw compute: 20.74 TFLOPS (Radeon X1800 GTO) vs 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 420). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 1647 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1800 GTO | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 141+3% | 137 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+100% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.74 TFLOPS+173% | 7.589 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz+37% | 1647 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+100% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+19% | 0.84 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1800 GTO | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1800 GTO comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro NVS 420 has 4 GB. The Quadro NVS 420 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon X1800 GTO) vs 2 MB (Quadro NVS 420) — the Radeon X1800 GTO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1800 GTO | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1800 GTO draws 300W versus the Quadro NVS 420's 100W — a 100% difference. The Quadro NVS 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1800 GTO) vs 350W (Quadro NVS 420). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon X1800 GTO | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 100W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 160mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 1.4+180% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1800 GTO launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Quadro NVS 420 launched at $0 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.0 (Radeon X1800 GTO) vs 6.8 (Quadro NVS 420) — the Radeon X1800 GTO offers 2.9% better value. The Radeon X1800 GTO is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon X1800 GTO | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0+3% | 6.8 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GP104 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #42 | #266 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















