
Radeon X1900 GT vs GeForce Go 7700

Radeon X1900 GT
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon X1900 GT is positioned at rank #354 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1900 GT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1900 GT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The Radeon X1900 GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1900 GT.
| Insight | Radeon X1900 GT | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1900 GT and GeForce Go 7700

Radeon X1900 GT
The Radeon X1900 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 146 points. Launch price was $899.

GeForce Go 7700
The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1900 GT scores 146 and the GeForce Go 7700 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1900 GT is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce Go 7700 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,376 (Radeon X1900 GT) vs 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700). Raw compute: 51.48 TFLOPS (Radeon X1900 GT) vs 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700). Boost clocks: 2394 MHz vs 1085 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1900 GT | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 146 | 148+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5376+250% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 51.48 TFLOPS+1445% | 3.333 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2394 MHz+121% | 1085 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+500% | 32 |
| TMUs | 336+163% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+2208% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1900 GT | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1900 GT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7700 has 512 MB. The GeForce Go 7700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon X1900 GT) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce Go 7700) — the Radeon X1900 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1900 GT | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1900 GT draws 300W versus the GeForce Go 7700's 230W — a 26.4% difference. The GeForce Go 7700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1900 GT) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1900 GT | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 230W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.6+20% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1900 GT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon X1900 GT | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | Navi 31 | GK104 |
| Release | November 3 2022 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #21 | #398 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















