
RADEON X550 vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

RADEON X550
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X550 is positioned at rank #334 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X550
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X550 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The RADEON X550 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X550.
| Insight | RADEON X550 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-15.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+15.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X550 and GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

RADEON X550
The RADEON X550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X550 scores 51 versus the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra's 59 — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra leads by 15.7%. The RADEON X550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra uses Rankine, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON X550) vs 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON X550) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra).
| Feature | RADEON X550 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 59+16% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS+75% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X550 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (RADEON X550) vs 384 KB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X550 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X550 draws 50W versus the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra's 116W — a 79.5% difference. The RADEON X550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X550) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X550 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-57% | 116W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0+100% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X550 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.1 (RADEON X550) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The RADEON X550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | RADEON X550 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Lexa | GF116 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #668 | #761 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















