RADEON X550 vs Radeon X1300

AMD

RADEON X550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1300

2020Core: 1327 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz
Similar parts
·······

RADEON X550 vs Radeon X1300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON X550 vs Radeon X1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON X550

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $40 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 46.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 58).
  • 2017 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1300

2020

Why buy it

  • +13.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • RADEON X550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1300 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 66.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.7% in PassMark G3D (58 vs 51), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON X550 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 46.6% (0.8 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON X550 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1300 has the stronger long-term case.

RADEON X550 vs Radeon X1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RADEON X550

The RADEON X550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon X1300

The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON X550 scores 51 versus the Radeon X1300's 58 — the Radeon X1300 leads by 13.7%. The RADEON X550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon X1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON X550) vs 1,408 (Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON X550) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

FeatureRADEON X550Radeon X1300
G3D Mark Score
51
58+14%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
512
1408+175%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.211 TFLOPS
4.632 TFLOPS+282%
Boost Clock
1183 MHz
1645 MHz+39%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
88+175%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1.5 MB+500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON X550Radeon X1300
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON X550 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1300. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (RADEON X550) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON X550Radeon X1300
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1.5 MB+500%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X550 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1300's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The RADEON X550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X550) vs 350W (Radeon X1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRADEON X550Radeon X1300
TDP
50W-50%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
1.0+67%
0.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON X550 came in at $60, while the Radeon X1300 launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON X550 was 40% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (RADEON X550) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1300) — the RADEON X550 offers 33.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1300 (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureRADEON X550Radeon X1300
MSRP
$60-40%
$100
Performance per Dollar
0.8+33%
0.6
Codename
Lexa
Navi 14
Release
April 20 2017
May 28 2020
Ranking
#668
#336

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.