
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

RADEON X550
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL vs RADEON X550 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL vs RADEON X550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL vs RADEON X550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
2009Why buy it
- ✅+17.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RADEON X550
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 60).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌22.4% HIGHER MSRP$60 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL vs RADEON X550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

RADEON X550
The RADEON X550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL scores 60 versus the RADEON X550's 51 — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL leads by 17.6%. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is built on TeraScale while the RADEON X550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 512 (RADEON X550). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON X550).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 60+18% | 51 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 ×2+56% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.211 TFLOPS+38% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 ×2+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X550 carries 256 MB. MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL and 64-bit on the RADEON X550.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL draws 30W versus the RADEON X550's 50W — a 50% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 350W (RADEON X550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0+100% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL came in at $49, while the RADEON X550 launched at $60. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL was 18.3% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) vs 0.8 (RADEON X550) — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL offers 50% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X550 (2017 vs 2009).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL | RADEON X550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-18% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2+50% | 0.8 |
| Codename | M98 | Lexa |
| Release | January 9 2009 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #818 | #668 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














