RADEON X550
VS
MOBILITY RADEON 9800

RADEON X550 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9800

AMD

RADEON X550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
VS
AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

2010Core: 700 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X550 is positioned at rank 334 and the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is on rank 737, so the RADEON X550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON X550

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
8534%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8199%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
8104%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
8089%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
8073%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
8027%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
7926%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
7896%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
7824%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
7802%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
7708%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
7692%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
7553%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
7548%
#319
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
9412%
#334
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#336
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#337
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
96%
#339
Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $49
89%
#340
GeForce 6600 GT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
85%
#341
RADEON X600 PRO
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
80%
#342
Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
78%
#343
RADEON X300SE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $60
74%
#345
RADEON X800 GTO
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
68%
#346
Radeon X1300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
68%
#347
Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
68%
#348
Radeon X1800 GTO
MSRP: $249|Avg: $20
67%
#349
GeForce 7800 GT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $20
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9800

#726
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
54285%
#728
49210%
#729
49080%
#733
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
44630%
#734
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
44325%
#736
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
100%
#737
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
100%
#738
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
80%
#739
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
75%
#741
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
50%
#742
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
50%
#743
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
40%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
30%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
30%
#746
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
25%
#747
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
20%
#748
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
20%
#749
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
15%
#750
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
15%
#751
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
15%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X550 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The RADEON X550 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON X550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9800.

InsightRADEON X550MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Performance
Leading raw performance (+10.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-10.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON X550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the RADEON X550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $25), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 177.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRADEON X550MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+177.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X550 and MOBILITY RADEON 9800

AMD

RADEON X550

The RADEON X550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 46 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON X550 scores 51 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9800's 46 — the RADEON X550 leads by 10.9%. The RADEON X550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON X550) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON X550) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9800).

FeatureRADEON X550MOBILITY RADEON 9800
G3D Mark Score
51+11%
46
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512
800+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.211 TFLOPS+8%
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON X550MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRADEON X550MOBILITY RADEON 9800
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X550 draws 50W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9800's 50W — a 0% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X550) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRADEON X550MOBILITY RADEON 9800
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
1.0+11%
0.9
💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON X550 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 launched at $229 and now averages $25. The RADEON X550 costs 60% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.1 (RADEON X550) vs 1.8 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) — the RADEON X550 offers 183.3% better value. The RADEON X550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureRADEON X550MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP
$60-74%
$229
Avg Price (30d)
$10-60%
$25
Performance per Dollar
5.1+183%
1.8
Codename
Lexa
Broadway
Release
April 20 2017
January 7 2010
Ranking
#668
#846