RADEON X800 GT vs nForce 750a SLI
RADEON X800 GT
Popular choices:
nForce 750a SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X800 GT is positioned at rank #361 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 GT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X800 GT is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The RADEON X800 GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The nForce 750a SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the nForce 750a SLI offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X800 GT | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON X800 GT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 GT and nForce 750a SLI
RADEON X800 GT
The RADEON X800 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $649.
nForce 750a SLI
The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X800 GT scores 84 and the nForce 750a SLI reaches 83 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X800 GT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the nForce 750a SLI uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON X800 GT) vs 768 (nForce 750a SLI).
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 84+1% | 83 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+500% | 768 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X800 GT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the nForce 750a SLI has 512 MB. The nForce 750a SLI offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X800 GT draws 300W versus the nForce 750a SLI's 30W — a 163.6% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 GT) vs 350W (nForce 750a SLI). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 30W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 2.8+833% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X800 GT launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the nForce 750a SLI launched at $0 and now averages $0. The nForce 750a SLI costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.6 (RADEON X800 GT) vs Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The RADEON X800 GT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | Navi 21 | N14P-GT |
| Release | October 28 2020 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #42 | #616 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X800 GT and nForce 750a SLI
