RADEON X800 GT vs Radeon X1650 Pro
RADEON X800 GT
Popular choices:
Radeon X1650 Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X800 GT is positioned at rank 361 and the Radeon X1650 Pro is on rank 334, so the Radeon X1650 Pro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 GT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 Pro
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1650 Pro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X800 GT.
| Insight | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon X1650 Pro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $15 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1.2% better value per dollar than the RADEON X800 GT.
| Insight | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 GT and Radeon X1650 Pro
RADEON X800 GT
The RADEON X800 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $649.
Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X800 GT scores 84 and the Radeon X1650 Pro reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X800 GT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON X800 GT) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 84 | 85+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+80% | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz | 2581 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+80% | 160 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X800 GT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 Pro has 512 MB. The Radeon X1650 Pro offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X800 GT draws 300W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon X1650 Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 GT) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X800 GT launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.6 (RADEON X800 GT) vs 5.7 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the Radeon X1650 Pro offers 1.8% better value. The Radeon X1650 Pro is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $100-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.6 | 5.7+2% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 22 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #42 | #92 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X800 GT and Radeon X1650 Pro
