
RADEON X800 GT

Radeon X1650 Pro
RADEON X800 GT vs Radeon X1650 Pro Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON X800 GT vs Radeon X1650 Pro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON X800 GT vs Radeon X1650 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON X800 GT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌149% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Radeon X1650 Pro
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 152% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON X800 GT vs Radeon X1650 Pro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON X800 GT
The RADEON X800 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X800 GT scores 84 and the Radeon X1650 Pro reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X800 GT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON X800 GT) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 84 | 85+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+80% | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz | 2581 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+80% | 160 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X800 GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 Pro carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 Pro gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON X800 GT and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 Pro.
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X800 GT draws 300W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon X1650 Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 GT) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RADEON X800 GT came in at $249, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon X1650 Pro was 59.8% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (RADEON X800 GT) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the Radeon X1650 Pro offers 166.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 Pro (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON X800 GT | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $100-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 0.8+167% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 22 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #42 | #92 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














