RADEON X800 GT vs Radeon X1650 Pro

AMD

RADEON X800 GT

2020Core: 1825 MHzBoost: 2250 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1650 Pro

2023Boost: 2581 MHz
Similar parts
·······

RADEON X800 GT vs Radeon X1650 Pro Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON X800 GT vs Radeon X1650 Pro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON X800 GT vs Radeon X1650 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON X800 GT

2020

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 149% HIGHER MSRP
    $249 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

Radeon X1650 Pro

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $149 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Delivers 152% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1650 Pro is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (85 vs 84), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1650 Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1650 Pro makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 152% (0.8 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

RADEON X800 GT vs Radeon X1650 Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RADEON X800 GT

The RADEON X800 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $649.

AMD

Radeon X1650 Pro

The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

The RADEON X800 GT scores 84 and the Radeon X1650 Pro reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X800 GT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON X800 GT) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 2581 MHz.

FeatureRADEON X800 GTRadeon X1650 Pro
G3D Mark Score
84
85+1%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
7 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
4608+80%
2560
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
2581 MHz+15%
ROPs
128+100%
64
TMUs
288+80%
160

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON X800 GTRadeon X1650 Pro
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X800 GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 Pro carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 Pro gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON X800 GT and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 Pro.

FeatureRADEON X800 GTRadeon X1650 Pro
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X800 GT draws 300W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon X1650 Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 GT) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRADEON X800 GTRadeon X1650 Pro
TDP
300W
250W-17%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
0.3
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON X800 GT came in at $249, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon X1650 Pro was 59.8% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (RADEON X800 GT) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the Radeon X1650 Pro offers 166.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 Pro (2023 vs 2020).

FeatureRADEON X800 GTRadeon X1650 Pro
MSRP
$249
$100-60%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
0.8+167%
Codename
Navi 21
Navi 22
Release
October 28 2020
October 17 2023
Ranking
#42
#92

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.