RADEON X800 GTO vs GeForce GT 320M
RADEON X800 GTO
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 320M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X800 GTO is positioned at rank 345 and the GeForce GT 320M is on rank 163, so the GeForce GT 320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 GTO
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 320M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X800 GTO uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON X800 GTO likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 320M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 GTO is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 320M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X800 GTO | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON X800 GTO remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 GTO and GeForce GT 320M
RADEON X800 GTO
The RADEON X800 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points. Launch price was $649.
GeForce GT 320M
The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X800 GTO scores 115 and the GeForce GT 320M reaches 114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X800 GTO is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GT 320M uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON X800 GTO) vs 384 (GeForce GT 320M). Raw compute: 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 GTO) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X800 GTO | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 115 | 114 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+1100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.74 TFLOPS+1740% | 1.127 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz+53% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+700% | 16 |
| TMUs | 288+1100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+614% | 0.14 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X800 GTO | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X800 GTO comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 320M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 320M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON X800 GTO) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 320M) — the RADEON X800 GTO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X800 GTO | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 1 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X800 GTO draws 300W versus the GeForce GT 320M's 30W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce GT 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 GTO) vs 350W (GeForce GT 320M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X800 GTO | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 30W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 3.8+850% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X800 GTO is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | RADEON X800 GTO | GeForce GT 320M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | — |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GP108 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #42 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X800 GTO and GeForce GT 320M
