RADEON X800GT vs Quadro FX 540

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X800GT is positioned at rank 352 and the Quadro FX 540 is on rank 397, so the RADEON X800GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800GT

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

14508%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

13938%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

13776%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

13752%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

13724%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

13646%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

13474%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

13424%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

13300%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

13264%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

13104%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

13076%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

12840%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

12832%

#336

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

16000%

#351

Radeon X1650 GTO

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

100%

#352

RADEON X800GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $10

100%

#353

RADEON X700

MSRP: $149|Avg: $10

98%

#354

RADEON X600 SE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

98%

#355

Radeon X1900 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $20

98%

#356

GeForce G200

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

90%

#357

RADEON X700 PRO

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

84%

#358

GeForce 6500

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

76%

#360

RADEON X800 GT

MSRP: $249|Avg: $15

68%

#361

GeForce 6600

MSRP: $270|Avg: $10

64%

#362

RADEON 9550

MSRP: $129|Avg: $30

54%

#363

GeForce FX 5700LE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

50%

#364

Radeon X1600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $49

50%

#365

GeForce PCX 5750

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

46%

#366

GeForce FX 5700

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

42%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 540

#382

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

54715%

#397

Quadro FX 540

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

100%

#398

Quadro 7000

MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300

89%

#399

Quadro FX 1500

MSRP: $699|Avg: $30

89%

#400

Tesla M2070-Q

MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50

89%

#401

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

85%

#402

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

85%

#403

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

81%

#405

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

74%

#406

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

74%

#407

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

67%

#409

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

63%

#410

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

59%

#411

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

59%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X800GT is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The RADEON X800GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 540 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 540 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X800GT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	RADEON X800GT	Quadro FX 540
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON X800GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Quadro FX 540, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 48.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON X800GT	Quadro FX 540
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+48.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($10)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X800GT Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 540 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800GT and Quadro FX 540

RADEON X800GT

The RADEON X800GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 80 points. Launch price was $579.

Quadro FX 540

The Quadro FX 540 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RADEON X800GT scores 80 and the Quadro FX 540 reaches 81 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X800GT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro FX 540 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (RADEON X800GT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 540). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800GT) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 540).

Feature	RADEON X800GT	Quadro FX 540
G3D Mark Score	80	81+1%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	3840+1500%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.17 TFLOPS+2499%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+200%	80
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X800GT	Quadro FX 540
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X800GT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 540 has 128 MB. The RADEON X800GT offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON X800GT) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 540) — the RADEON X800GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X800GT	Quadro FX 540
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X800GT draws 250W versus the Quadro FX 540's 189W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800GT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 540). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON X800GT	Quadro FX 540
TDP	250W	189W-24%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	0.3	0.4+33%

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON X800GT launched at $160 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 540 launched at $299 and now averages $15. The RADEON X800GT costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.0 (RADEON X800GT) vs 5.4 (Quadro FX 540) — the RADEON X800GT offers 48.1% better value. The RADEON X800GT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2008).