RADEON X850 XT vs Quadro FX 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X850 XT is positioned at rank 739 and the Quadro FX 370 is on rank 373, so the Quadro FX 370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON X850 XT

#729

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

67856%

#731

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

61513%

#732

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

61350%

#736

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

55788%

#737

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

55406%

#739

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

100%

#740

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

94%

#742

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

63%

#743

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

63%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

50%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

38%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

38%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

31%

#748

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

25%

#749

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

25%

#750

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

19%

#751

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

19%

#752

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

19%

#753

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

19%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

13%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370

#358

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

22728%

#373

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

100%

#374

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

94%

#375

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

94%

#376

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

94%

#377

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

92%

#378

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

89%

#379

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

86%

#380

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

86%

#381

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

82%

#382

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

82%

#383

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

72%

#384

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

68%

#385

Quadro FX 350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

66%

#386

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

66%

#387

Tesla M2070

MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50

65%

#388

GRID V100D-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

65%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X850 XT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2008). The RADEON X850 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 370 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X850 XT.

Insight	RADEON X850 XT	Quadro FX 370
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON X850 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $500 for the Quadro FX 370, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 864.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON X850 XT	Quadro FX 370
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+864.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($50)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X850 XT Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 370 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X850 XT and Quadro FX 370

RADEON X850 XT

The RADEON X850 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.

Quadro FX 370

The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RADEON X850 XT scores 81 and the Quadro FX 370 reaches 84 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X850 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro FX 370 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON X850 XT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370). Raw compute: 13.21 TFLOPS (RADEON X850 XT) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370).

Feature	RADEON X850 XT	Quadro FX 370
G3D Mark Score	81	84+4%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	2560+967%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	13.21 TFLOPS+2023%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+100%	80
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X850 XT	Quadro FX 370
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RADEON X850 XT) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 370) — the RADEON X850 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X850 XT	Quadro FX 370
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (RADEON X850 XT) vs 10.0 (Quadro FX 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	RADEON X850 XT	Quadro FX 370
DirectX	9.0b	10.0+11%
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X850 XT draws 165W versus the Quadro FX 370's 189W — a 13.6% difference. The RADEON X850 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X850 XT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 186mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	RADEON X850 XT	Quadro FX 370
TDP	165W-13%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	186mm	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Perf/Watt	0.5+25%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON X850 XT launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro FX 370 launched at $129 and now averages $500. The RADEON X850 XT costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.6 (RADEON X850 XT) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 370) — the RADEON X850 XT offers 700% better value. The RADEON X850 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2008).